Americans now spend over $1.5 trillion annually on
medical care. There is no end in sight
to rising costs. From the medical community's standpoint, why should
there be? If you have a cash cow you
milk it for all it is worth.
The public's and the government's only protestation
is when there isn't enough money. The
question is not whether we need more drugs, vaccines, diagnostic machines, lab
tests, surgeries and hospital facilities, but rather how will it be paid
for. The medical behemoth is considered
as essential to life as food and water and thus it is petted, pampered and
protected. While it gorges itself and
swells to obscene size, everyone clamors for unlimited access to it by way of insurance
and government entitlement programs.
Now then, if the medical system we have in place
were truly decreasing disease, optimizing people's health, increasing healthy
life span and decreasing mortality that would be one thing. But as we have learned from the foregoing,
that is not at all the case. Modern
medical care does not prevent disease or improve health; it is the number one
killer. Medical consumers are lambs being
led to the slaughter. They protect,
cuddle, honor and take pride in its techno-wizardry, and then wonder why it is
getting so rotund as they feed it by marching zombie-like right into its mouth.
The gorging and human sacrifice is ignored because
it is assumed that the esoteric scientific sophistication, shiny stainless
steel and elaborate machines are the best there is and if it is failing in any
respect then it just needs more dollar--to do what it is doing but only more
and better. Isolated heroic successes lead everyone to believe everything is
surely on track and that all it will take is more dollars and everyone's cure
will be a heroic success.
Time to step back, take a deep breath and oxygenate
the brain a little.
What does it say about our society when a huge
percentage of the gross national product is centered on illness?
Shouldn't it ring an alarm - other than the cry to increase taxes and create
medical entitlement programs and insurance to guarantee that everyone can
participate even more and grow it even further?
You would think that with all the money thrown at
the problem, health would be improving. But it is not, in spite of the
propaganda that health solutions are in a pill, on a surgery table or just
around the corner ... if we would just fund more research. Doesn't the
outrageous growth of medical expenditure in the absence of proportionate
salubrious results speak to the failure of the system, not its success?
Shouldn't health care, by definition, be moving in the opposite direction and
be self-eradicating?
When something is so clearly amuck, it's time to
take a close look at the philosophical underpinnings and assumptions. The underlying premise of modern medicine is
reductionistic materialism. However,
the body is not only fundamentally not matter, it is all one, it is holistic
and intimately linked with the rest of the world. The materialistic assumption that we are a mere amalgam of data,
parts and pieces that can be manipulated at will, and a chemical soup held in
by a membrane�a sort of test tube made of skin�is neither scientific nor
rational...nor does it work.
Materialism also leads to the quick-fix
approach. Hey, if a chemical in the
body is out of whack, take a chemical to neutralize it. If your gizzard is acting up, get it taken
out. If the medicine you are taking is
making you sick, take another medicine for that. If eating fries and pop cause a burning in the gullet, take a
pill. People want to think of their
bodies as an easily repaired machine, and doctors go right along.
The quick-fix approach fills the bill for an
instant-gratification society. It is
also simple, profitable and eliminates probing into people's lives to see what
is really the cause: run a test, check a number, give a pill and send a bill.
But is counter to the way the body operates. We are a self-healing
mechanism, infinitely complex, finely tuned and holistic, not just an
assemblage of pulleys, pipes, levers, protons and valves. To force the
body into submission with drugs or mechanical alterations throws it out of
balance because we do not fully understand what it is we are even tinkering
with. Manipulating parts without consideration for the balance of the
whole is doomed.
I am speaking here of the chronic degenerative
illnesses - cancer, heart disease, arthritis, and so on, not crises such as
anaphylactic shock or an operable tumor pressing on the heart. Modern
medicine can work miracles with these sorts of conditions because they are
mechanical - as opposed to metabolic and systemic - failures and thus respond
to mechanical solutions. The great degenerative disease killers today
result from longstanding problems of lifestyle imbalance and are not solved by
Band-Aids no matter how expensive they are.
People who spend years in esoteric and costly
medical training don't figure anyone other than them has a right to speak with
authority on the subject. That creates
pompous and closed minds. Health and
healing is not the place for that. Lives
and suffering are at stake. This is not to impugn the efforts of the many hard
working and often underpaid health care workers. But intent does not
erase result. As shown in a previous chapter, people who submit to
medical care are far more likely to be injured or killed than by any other life
choice they make. It must also be admitted that financial motive and ego
to one degree or another weave their way into the medical psyche.
Most doctors come to understand that disease is
self-inflicted through improper lifestyle choices. Few, however, have the financial courage to tell people that they
need to change their lives, not get another pill or have surgery. Patients will just go elsewhere where they
will be told what they want to hear. Or
the doctor might even be threatened with suit for offending a patient. Case in point is a New Hampshire doctor who
was turned in to the Board of Medicine and the attorney general for telling a
patient she needed to lose weight.
(Washington Post Aug 24, 2005)
As hard as doctors try to do what is right, there is
the constant financial pressure. There
are bills to pay and the potential for a lavish lifestyle. Doctors also feel entitled. A long and costly education, long hours, law
suits, malpractice insurance and putting up with an endless procession of
patients who will do nothing to help themselves seems deserving of more than average
pay. The solution is doing more. Conveniently, the medical standard of care
(what doctors are taught to do to avoid liability) encourages more of about
everything. More lab tests, longer
hospitalization, more diagnostics, more drugs and exploratory surgery. So, although in many cases the best advice
to a patient is to go home and make life changes, doctors too often do that
which is safe and creates income, which just so happens to be what the patient
wants anyway.
Medical insurance is not the solution. It shares the blame for the explosion in
healthcare costs. Give anyone access to
a bottomless vat of money that promises cure and they will dip in with gusto. If patients were made to pay as they go,
people would do more shopping and use more discernment. Doctors would be forced to use judgment as
well. The net result would be a lot
less unnecessary medical care. When responsibility
shifts to individuals to take care of themselves, there will be more health and
a lot less medical injury.
Since everything seems to move by the force of
dollars, why not shift the rewards? We could do it like it was done in
ancient times and even more recently in the Far East: Pay doctors as long
as the patient is well. If the patient becomes ill, the doctor forfeits
the pay. But that's too rational. There are too many money
interests fighting tooth and claw to keep things exactly as they are. It also
does not fit the fable that disease is "just one of those things" to
which we may innocently fall victim. Why hold the doctor (or ourselves,
more appropriately) accountable for an "act of God?"
As philosophically flawed as modern medicine is, it
is by and large an effect, not a cause.
Medical commerce is driven by consumer demand. If the market were not
there, the business of increased profit for increased health failure could not
exist.
People like to shift responsibility to others and
follow physics down the path of least resistance and effort. Heaven
forbid that we might have to change our lifestyle or become informed.
Let's just let someone else take care of everything for us. All it takes
is money. You know, like if the basement is leaking, the car won't start
or smoke comes out of the computer.
Money cures these things so why would it not cure us? So it is easily reasoned in our
consumer/repair/expert-oriented society, that if any problem is not being
solved, more money is the answer.
Don't wait for things to change. You
change. You can decide not to participate in the nonsense. You can
learn to take control and optimize your health by being the best you can be by
giving your mind and body the lifestyle and food it was designed for. Money really has nothing to do with the
solution to the problem. In fact, money
can spell your demise by not only the unhealthy lifestyle of indulgence it
permits, but by making it too easy to obtain the best and most that modern
medicine has to offer.
If people would learn how to take care of themselves
and take ownership of their own health, the medical sinkhole would shrivel and
the tidal wave of chronic degenerative diseases would dry up to a
trickle.
For further reading, or for more information about,
Dr Wysong and the Wysong Corporation please visit www.wysong.net or write to wysong@wysong.net. For resources on healthier foods for people
including snacks, and breakfast cereals please visit www.cerealwysong.com.